PVH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group has a net margin of -2.26% compared to PVH's net margin of -155.79%. PVH's return on equity of 7.95% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -68.6%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $91.73, signalling upside risk potential of 44.94%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 17.02%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Lucid Group.

PVH has a beta of 1.891, which suggesting that the stock is 89.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $235M. PVH's net income of -$44.8M is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$366.2M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.40x versus 6.53x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of -2.26% compared to PVH's net margin of 7.6%. PVH's return on equity of 7.95% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 29.99%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $91.73, signalling upside risk potential of 44.94%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $308.83 which suggests that it could grow by 14.15%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

PVH has a beta of 1.891, which suggesting that the stock is 89.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.510, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.974%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 27.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. PVH's net income of -$44.8M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $129M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 23.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.40x versus 2.45x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Thor Industries has a net margin of -2.26% compared to PVH's net margin of 4.67%. PVH's return on equity of 7.95% beat Thor Industries's return on equity of 5.48%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $91.73, signalling upside risk potential of 44.94%. On the other hand Thor Industries has an analysts' consensus of $88.17 which suggests that it could grow by 3.29%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Thor Industries, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Thor Industries.

PVH has a beta of 1.891, which suggesting that the stock is 89.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Thor Industries has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.094%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Thor Industries offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Thor Industries pays out 38.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Thor Industries quarterly revenues of $2.9B. PVH's net income of -$44.8M is lower than Thor Industries's net income of $135.2M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Thor Industries's PE ratio is 20.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.40x versus 0.47x for Thor Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -2.26% compared to PVH's net margin of 2.12%. PVH's return on equity of 7.95% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

PVH has a consensus price target of $91.73, signalling upside risk potential of 44.94%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $301.97 which suggests that it could fall by -6.46%. Given that PVH has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe PVH is more attractive than Tesla.

PVH has a beta of 1.891, which suggesting that the stock is 89.08% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

PVH has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.24%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PVH pays 1.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PVH's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PVH quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. PVH's net income of -$44.8M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, PVH's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.93x while Tesla's PE ratio is 177.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PVH is 0.40x versus 11.80x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.